Finding Your Science Flow: Yoga Lessons to Increase Productivity

Productivity

I love my job running a research lab. I love the problem-solving, the creativity, the autonomy. But I’d be lying if I said I didn’t have that “hair’s on fire” feeling most days. We’ve now added the stress of living and working through a pandemic to the equation. So how do I trade frantic and stressed for focused and serene?

About five years ago I decided to try a prenatal yoga class. I lucked into an awesome studio (Half Moon Yoga Studio in Franklin, TN) where I started learning the true point of yoga. It’s not about whether you can touch your toes or do lotus pose. It’s about slowly, deliberately moving your mind and body forward to increase what you’re capable of. It’s the self-discovery of realizing the strategies that resonate with you and calmly pushing aside those that don’t align with your personal or professional vision.

It was through yoga that I learned how to drop in and achieve focus to increase my productivity with less wasted energy. Here are the lessons I’ve learned after years of practice that I apply to my job and to my life:

You control your happiness and self-esteem. My yoga teacher asked us to reflect on the following questions:

    1. Who has the power to ruin your day? (Reviewer #2?)
    2. When did you give them that power?

I’m not sure about you, but that second question really landed with me. Don’t give that power away. It is yours to wield. Not Reviewer #2’s.

Change your drishti (focus) as needed to make progress. Indulge me and try the following:

    1. Try to balance on one leg (“tree pose”) while scanning quickly across the room with your eyes. Did you feel wobbly?
    2. Now try it as you focus on one fixed point on the wall (drishti). Did you wobble less?
    3. Now try the pose while focusing on a point on the floor. Did it feel different?

Continuing with the Reviewer #2 theme, think back to a manuscript/grant review that caused you to reach for a glass (bottle?) of wine. Push the discouragement aside to mentally pivot and find the actionable lesson. What can you learn that will guide productive strategies for the revision? My yoga teacher said, “Rejection is just redirection.” Just sit with that idea for a bit.

Be present in each moment. You can fast-forward through the whole movie if you want, but it really is more enjoyable to watch it one scene at a time. You miss a lot if you’re in a hurry. Pay attention to what is working and what isn’t working. Take time to have conversations with your peers and your team to spark creative ideas.

Eliminate counter-productive mental chatter. Focusing on physical movement and breathing is surprisingly calming once you get the hang of it. You don’t have to be a Zen master to do a few sun salutations. I even do a few in my office sometimes to quickly achieve a more focused state. Maybe listening to a quick guided meditation or nature sounds helps you. Experiment and find what speaks to you. Even a few minutes of grounding activities can help.

Balance and restoration is key. I don’t mean tree pose balance. I mean the balance provided by a counter-pose. Knees to chest is a good counter to a backbend. Child’s pose is a good counter to a strenuous pose. What is my counter pose to back to back grant deadlines? I plan something fun or relaxing. At the very least, I give myself permission to switch gears to pick up slack in other areas for a bit (manuscripts? teaching?). You don’t get very far when there’s no more gas in the tank. You lose your creative fire when burning the candle at both ends. It’s fine for short bursts, but you have to refuel.

Respect your limits. Is it wise to attempt something tough like a head stand right now? Maybe not. Learn what you are capable of and respect it. Say no to that teaching ask or whatever it is that will stretch you beyond your limits. Delegate or seek the help you need to meet your goals on time. Tune in to what you and your team have available to give right now and recognize that expecting more than 100% effort is demotivating.

Mindfulness and meditation is work. The point isn’t perfection. The key is that you regularly practice to find what works and what doesn’t. Spend the time doing the self-study and hard thinking to clear away the thoughts and activities that don’t serve your personal and professional goals. Namaste!

 

More Resources

Building Resiliency with Hypnosis and Mindfulness

Balancing on the Edge

Feeling Powerless in the Age of COVID (Part II)

“Zoom In” to Keep Group Review and Critique on Track

Doing Research / Productivity

Work-in-Progress sessions (WIPs) are at risk of getting bogged down at the wrong level of feedback, most often focusing on specific edits or details that may not be the top priority, with the focus often driven by those who speak up first.

Several steps can help deploy the group’s time well and find the right level of discussion:

  • Appoint a moderator to monitor the time and ensure all who have input are heard.
  • Ask the individual whose materials are being reviewed to give a brief (2-3 minutes max) overview of who the audience is for the work and where they feel they most need input.
  • Then use a zoom-in format for finding the right level for review and critique.

Most WIPs will not reach all levels of zooming in. This approach works because it ensures larger concerns are discussed first. Word and sentence edits are not crucial if the whole product is poorly organized or unclear.

To guide discussion at each level, use framing questions and topics like these:

30,000 feet

  • Is content appropriate for the audience?
  • Can the audience/reader summarize the gist accurately?
  • Are materials engaging (i.e., clarity, title, rationale, implications of findings)?
  • Are materials properly formatted?
  • Is speaking volume, intonation, and pace optimal?
  • Is use of space in poster or written material well-allocated?

10,000 feet 

  • Is the information well-organized?
  • Does it unfold in a logical fashion?
  • Was time/space allocation well-distributed?
  • Are methods clear and results flow from methods?
  • Does discussion overreach the results?
  • Are challenges and considerations addressed?

Forest 

  • Are materials attractive and within conventional expectations for style and clarity?
  • Is logic tight connecting rationale, objective, methods and results?
  • Is word choice crisp and consistent?

Trees

Is word choice consistent?

For presentations:

  • Quick slide-by-slide feedback

For written materials:

  • Section-by-section or
  • Paragraph-by-paragraph feedback
  • Include tables and figures

For posters:

Section-by-section feedback

Leaves

  • Font size, readability
  • Table and figure legends
  • Typos

Chlorophyll

  • Choice of stronger words
  • Use of symbols
  • Micro-edits
  • References

Additional Tips

  • Prohibit use of laptops and ask the group to silence devices.
  • Print materials for review in order to allow participants to provide edits and comments that may not fit in the discussion time.
  • Encourage return for additional rounds after revisions.

Save time for participants who have had review and critique in prior sessions to report on progress and to celebrate successes like publications and successful presentations.

Related Posts:

How to start a near-peer work-in-progress group
Avoiding Barriers Between Your Work and Your Reviewer
One-Minute Writing Roundup

Paper-Writing Checklists To Prevent Headaches Down the Road

Productivity / Writing & Publishing

Avoid authorship headaches and streamline the path from data to paper with these checklists.

CRediT Taxonomy

Developed by a group of librarians, information scientists, and the director of the MIT Press, the CRediT Taxonomy allows authors to define precisely the contributions every author makes to the paper. Potential contributions that can be attributed to individual authors include conceptualization, methodology, data curation, visualization, funding acquisition, project management, and writing (broken into original draft and reviewing/editing), along with several others. Use it at the beginning of a project to assign tasks or simply keep it in front of you as you and colleagues develop a paper, checking off items as contributed.

Several journals, including those published by Cell Press, now encourage or require use of this taxonomy.  The Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information (better known as CASRAI) collaborated with the NIH to link CRediT to ORCID and include contributor roles in publication metadata.

Get the checklist.

Authorship Grids

Two early career researchers and a journal editor recently put together a series of detailed authorship grids for quantitative, qualitative, and literature synthesis manuscripts as part of an article on grids’ use and effectiveness. The grids lay out responsibilities associated with the roles of first author, middle authors, and senior author in each type of manuscript, from who writes the IRB application to who coordinates manuscript revision.

Grids are meant to inspire discussion rather than regulate who does what, and so are completely customizable to your team, the project you’re doing, and how you prefer to split up the work.  They can also be submitted to journals for attribution of author contributions.

PubMed citation

Read the article and get the grids.

CONSORT Checklists

The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Group provides many resources and best practices for turning your trial into a paper to be proud of.  The most well known is the CONSORT 2010 checklist for reporting a randomized controlled trial, but they also provide checklists for reporting pragmatic trials, N-of-1 trials, harms, patient reported outcomes, and more.

The checklists provide both an explanation of what each of 25 elements of the paper should contain or look like for each kind of trial and examples of correctly written elements.  Using the checklist will ensure you include everything necessary for a complete and transparent report of your trial’s findings, from eligibility criteria to outcomes, randomization and blinding to losses and exclusions, and more.

CONSORT also provides a flow diagram for patient enrollment and progression through a trial. Not only can this be a useful figure in a paper, but it can help you plan your trial from the very beginning.

View the checklists. (Link defaults to CONSORT 2010 checklist; use dropdown at top right to explore other checklists.)

Get the flow diagram.

STROBE Checklists

STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) has produced several checklists, similar to those from CONSORT, of what to include in each section of a paper on observational studies. The group has developed checklists for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies.

Get the checklists.

SRQR Checklists

As above, developers of the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research have created a checklist for papers in the qualitative research world.

Get the checklist.

If the checklists above don’t fit your type of research, never fear: The EQUATOR Network (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) has Get the checklist. to suit all kinds of research. Whether you do animal studies, case reports, systematic reviews or economic evaluations, there’s a list to help you showcase your data in the clearest, most effective and complete way.

Additional Resources

Vexing Issues for New PIs: Picking Corresponding Author, Potential Reviewers, Blacklisting and Other Angst

A Big Step Forward in Standardizing Rules for Authorship

Author, Author, Who’s Got the Author?

Not that Kind of Investment: Tales of Time Commitment

Productivity

One of the biggest adjustments in being a principal investigator (PI) running a research lab has been the near constant, usually urgent, demands on my time. Some of these demands are enjoyable (new data!) some less so (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols, blah!). Gone are the days when my two main occupations were writing and experiments. Now it is meetings, protocols, training, and putting out whatever fires have arisen from smoldering tasks ignored. My bench is lonely, my inbox is full, and trainees keep reminding me about things I have apparently forgotten. In an attempt to reclaim my time and sanity, I have started protecting my time like never before. As always these days, n=me, and these are my emerging strategies for time management.

Identify strategies that work for you: Above all else, identify time management strategies that work for you. For me, my most productive time is in the morning, so that is when I sit and write. I have tried to sub-divide my morning time with Pomodoro, but the forced break times interrupt my focused time. I have also tried timeboxing, committing a certain amount of time to a task and no more. Although better than Pomodoro, I still underestimate writing time and have found my writing time is best left as a block. If I finish early, I can move on to other tasks. Otherwise, I keep working until I am done or until I cannot write anymore. Where I do find timeboxing useful is for small tasks, like responding to emails, booking conference travel, social media, and smaller service tasks that should have finite time requirements.

Limit distractions: This is easier to say than to implement. Keeping off social media during the day is easier than not checking email. On big writing days or close to grant deadlines, I do not log into email until my brain is fried from writing and I need a break. This seems to work pretty well and if people really need something, they follow-up with a phone call. I also limit the number of impromptu meetings. Unless it is urgent, I ask most people who stop by the office to schedule an in office/coffee/lunch meeting.

Use your calendar for everything: I have a full year’s worth of events on my office calendar, always in sight. This includes immovable occurrences like grant deadlines, conferences, and life events like vacations or weddings. At any moment, I can tell you whether I can commit to a date for a seminar or conference. As soon as I commit, the date goes on the board. Electronic and paper calendars work equally well, but I prefer dry erase, since this gives me the option to include a full twelve months and not just the calendar year.

Track your activities: Any activities that are not part of my research program, I document. This includes time spent in meetings, seminars, committees, etc. Part of this has to do with annual documentation on my faculty activities form, but it is also important for me to identify how much time I am spending on activities and whether they are worth the time investment. Unfortunately there are tasks from which you cannot opt out, like the departmental seminar, but that does not mean they do not count towards your percent time. Having data documenting your hours of service or teaching can be really powerful when you are “saying no” to requests.

Learn to say no: You cannot attend every conference, every seminar, and every event to which you are invited. You can also not write every grant for which you are eligible or collaborate on every project. You cannot agree to review every paper and take on every student who knocks on your door, looking for a lab opportunity. Identify the opportunities for which you have time and agree to those. If you are not sure you have time, you do not. Also, share the wealth. If you cannot do a review, speak at a conference, or participate in a committee, suggest one of your new colleagues (with their permission, of course!) who might still be trying to break into these spaces.

Travel with purpose: Travel is one of the biggest disruptors, but also the best opportunity to network and share your research group’s work.  The costs of these great opportunities are time out of the office (with tasks continuing to smolder) and a return to a growing to-do list coupled with lost sleep and disruption of home life. Identifying specific goals for work travel can help you decide whether a trip is worth the time, money, and effort. I will cover how I pick which talks and conferences to attend in my next blog post.

Do not steal time: There are only so many hours in the day. If you keep taking hours from your personal time and giving them to work time, you are stealing time. Be firm on the amount of time you are working versus not working. I am not here to tell you how many hours you should be working (Twitter has that covered), only that working too many keeps you from doing the life things that need to get done and/or are enjoyable. Of course there will be times when you work more than others. But, there are only so many weeks you can tell yourself “I just have to get through this week” or “I just have to get through this month” before it becomes a problem. This has been a recurring problem for me, and part of the motivation of implementing some of these strategies.

Invest time in yourself: This should go without saying, and I hope you are better about it than I am, but you have invested a lot of time, money, and effort into your career, so make sure you are investing some of that into yourself. It does not matter what this looks like: gym time, hobbies, travel, kid-centered activities, reading great literature or the newest young adult novel, etc. Be attentive to your health and your relationships. Building a life outside of the lab can help you weather the inevitable rejections and failures in your research program. Without this balance, a bad week in lab can feel like a bad week in life. Try to build in good things to buffer the bad work times.

I admitted on Twitter that I have been working on this post for two months. Part of this has been trying out Pomodoro and timeboxing. The other part has been overcommitting to work tasks not directly related to my science. But, these time management strategies seem to be paying off, and I am actually ahead of schedule on my next two grant submissions. Now, I just need to take my own advice and commit some time to health and wellness. Stay tuned for more tales!

Did I miss an important point? Do you have questions or concerns about the post? Or perhaps a time management strategy to contribute! Feel free to send some electrons my way in the comments, via Twitter @PipetteProtag, or through traditional electronic mail pipette.protagonist@gmail.com

More Resources

How to REALLY Manage Your Time

Tune Your When, How Much, and What in Your Days

Acting on the Essential

How to Protect Your Protected Time

Doing Research / Faculty Life / Productivity

You’ve just gotten your K award—awesome!  75% of your professional effort is now protected to focus on your research and career development.  But wait.  What about that class you teach, or those days your department expects you to be in clinic, or the students whose dissertation committee you’re on, or…

Keeping 75% of your time protected can quickly get complicated.  Compliance experts Tesha Garcia-Taylor, MBA, and Robert Dow, MBA, recently presented to a group of Vanderbilt career development awardees their top tips for keeping on the straight and narrow.

First, consider the pie.  Pizza, if you like.  The pie is all of the effort you give to your work in an average year, across research, clinical, teaching, and any other activities you probably wouldn’t do unless your institution was paying you.  It includes everything from being in the OR to reading cell cultures to preparing a class syllabus to checking your work email.  Of this entire pie, 75% (six slices of your standard eight-slice pizza) should be a.) your research, or b.) your career development, which can include writing grants, presenting your work at meetings, and other things that might not be specifically sitting at a bench/interviewing research subjects/analyzing data that we’ll get to in a moment.

“But I’m in clinic 15 hours a week.  Isn’t that more than 25% of a week?”  Well, what’s a normal work-week for you?  More importantly, what’s a normative week for your profession?  Specifically, for your specialty—surgeons are more likely to work 80-hour weeks on a standard basis than PhD scientists, for example.  At Vanderbilt, a typical work-week for most, not all, of our faculty is right around 60 hours.  So 15 hours a week of clinic would actually be exactly 25% of a week in that scenario.  (This ignores the fact that you might also want/need to do things like go to grand rounds or complete compliance training, teach clinical trainees, etc., so best not to assume that 15 hours is all you’d be doing that isn’t research or career development.)

“Okay, but half the faculty in our tiny department just went on maternity leave, and I have to teach this and cover for that and all these other things.  I can’t just say nope, sorry.  What do I do?”

Option 1: Explode your workweek to 100 hours.  Fit in 25 hours of teaching/clinic/other and focus on your career development for 75.  We at Edge for Scholars (also anyone sane) do not recommend this option.

Option 2: Let the class/clinic/whatever take up 40% of your time this month or quarter, but devote 90% to your K work for the next month/quarter.  Effort should average out over the year, not the day or even the month.  That said, keeping effort balanced each quarter is preferable, because it’s easy to let things slide until there’s not enough time left in the year to get the right average.

Option 3: Say to your leadership, “I’m coming up on my annual progress report/I’m six months into my award/I’m [fill in appropriate time marker here], and I’m concerned that things aren’t squaring up with my effort on this K award.”  It’s not an urban legend that institutions around the country have had to give back money to the feds because they didn’t let a K awardee have his or her protected time.  Your department doesn’t want to give back grant money or be scrutinized by the compliance office or NIH, we promise.

However, the best time to discuss your effort with your boss is before you submit the grant proposal.  Mutually decide what activities you will put down if you get the award, and get that agreement in writing in the letter of institutional support.  When thinking about what you would drop to focus on your K award, consider a few things:

What can you really not miss?  If everyone in your department including Professor Multimillion Dollar Lab goes to the department seminar, you’re going to the seminar.  But that likely means you can miss journal club.  Go to the things that are most relevant to you, not to every event.

As well, what national things should you keep attending?  If you’re going to a meeting to network with potential collaborators and disseminate your research, of course keep going; this falls under your K effort.  But if, for example, the society for your specialty has an annual meeting that’s mostly attended by clinicians in private practice, you don’t necessarily need to be the one who takes the residents there to present.  Consider attending some meetings every other or every few years.

Does it overlap? Many activities that look like service may ultimately end up feeding into your research.  Say you need to learn how to read a particular kind of PET scan or a how to perform a new microscopy technique, so you visit a colleague and learn it from them.  In learning the new thing, you work on scans or samples from your colleague’s work that need to be read/analyzed.  Does this help them get through a number of scans or samples?  Sure, but it also helps you master these skills, so as far as the feds are concerned, that effort fits with your K.  Similarly, teaching a student who’s working on your research may pay dividends for them in the form of a degree, but it also helps your research get done.

Get to know your financial officers.  They want to help you understand and comply with regulations around effort.  If you don’t already receive a monthly budget and effort report, ask for regular updates to make sure they line up with reality.  This will become even more important as you move on to larger grants and run a bigger research team.

Protecting 75% of your time requires you to be proactive.  Check in regularly with yourself to make sure you’re spending the right amount of effort on your K work, and follow the advice above if things start looking unbalanced.

More Resources

Designing Your Career

Not that Kind of Grant Application: Tales of Career Development Awards 

More Things I Wish I’d Known Before I Wrote My K

Read This: Insights on Priorities Including Doing Less

Productivity

We hosted Dr. Paul Harris, mastermind of REDCap and ResearchMatch and local guru of efficiency lifehacks, for a seminar on honing your professional edge. He shared these choices as an eclectic mix currently engaging his thoughts.

Habit 3 audiobook

by Steven Covey

“E.M. Gray once observed, ‘The successful person has the habit of doing the things failures don’t like to do. They don’t like doing them either necessarily. But their disliking is subordinated to the strength of their purpose.’ This is the essence of Habit 3. You’ll learn a new mindset of examining how you spend your time, and you’ll learn how to focus your efforts in ways that create greater success both professionally and personally.” (excerpt from Amazon.com)

The Power of Habit

by Charles Duhigg

“Charles Duhigg, an investigative reporter for The New York Times…has read hundreds of scientific papers and interviewed many of the scientists who wrote them, and relays interesting findings on habit formation and change from the fields of social psychology, clinical psychology and neuroscience. This is not a self-help book conveying one author’s homespun remedies, but a serious look at the science of habit formation and change.”

Getting Things Done

by David Allen

GTD is best known for the Two-Minute Rule: if a task crosses your desk that can be completed in two minutes – do it immediately. If not, file it according to context, and priority level. The idea is simple: dealing with it right away clears the decks quickly. Setting it aside demands looking at it again, reviewing, re-thinking, assigning a time to get it done; all of a sudden a short task takes on far more time and importance than it’s worth.”

The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People

by Stephen R. Covey

“The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen R. Covey is a self-improvement book. It is written on Covey’s belief that the way we see the world is entirely based on our own perceptions. In order to change a given situation, we must change ourselves, and in order to change ourselves, we must be able to change our perceptions.”

First Things First

by Stephen R. Covey

“What are ‘first things?’ First things are those things you, personally, find of most worth. If you put first things first, you are organizing and managing time and events according to the personal priorities you established…”

How to Write A Lot

by Paul J. Silvia

“…Silvia is an academic himself (one with an intimidating list of publications too!) and knows academics very well. This means he understands how they (we?) like to build group solidarity around shared hardships and goes to unveil the barriers we construct on the way to becoming productive writers. He proceeds to deconstruct this pen/keyboard martyrdom, one barrier at the time. This guide also includes advice on starting a writing group and helpful chapters on the technicalities of academic writing and style.”

Essentialism

by Greg McKeown

“Our whole society has become consumed by the undisciplined pursuit of more. The only way to overcome this problem is to change the way we think—adopt the mindset of only doing the things that are essential—and do it now.”

Rest

by Alex Soojung-Kim Pang

“If work is our national religion, Pang is the philosopher reintegrating our bifurcated selves. As he adeptly shows, not only are work and rest not in opposition, they’re inextricably bound, each enhancing the other. ‘Work and rest aren’t opposites like black and white or good and evil,’ Pang writes. ‘They’re more like different points on life’s wave.’ “

Drop the Ball

by Tiffany Dufu

“The book is packed with relatable, too-close-to-home lessons for overachievers of any ilk — whether at home, or at work. At work, it’s called delegating, and it’s not a remotely new concept. If you’re overseeing a team, you trust others to do what they do best, and you don’t do every little thing yourself. That’s why you have a team! Ever since finishing ‘Drop the Ball,’ I can’t stop thinking of its takeaways at work.”

My Year of Yes

by Shonda Rhimes

“Fueled by anxiety and self-doubt, Rhimes walled herself off however she could to the point that her eldest sister told her during a 2013 Thanksgiving conversation, ‘You never say yes to anything.’ That revelation slowly ate away at Rhimes, and she decided to make 2014 the year she said yes to doing all of the things that scared her, such as agreeing to deliver the commencement address at Dartmouth College, her alma mater. In the process, she became a much happier, more enlightened person.”

BONUS Reading Hack:

  • Check out apps like this one which give you an in-depth synopsis of the book, basically cutting to the good stuff (free trial then subscription fees will apply).

This Reading Roundup selection was introduced (and informed through group discussion) during a seminar led by Dr. Paul Harris titled “Being Productive.”

Paul Harris, PhD, is a Professor of Biomedical Informatics in the School of Medicine and a Professor of Biomedical Engineering in the School of Engineering at Vanderbilt University. He serves as Director of the Vanderbilt Office of Research Informatics and specializes in the development of innovative software platforms to support the research enterprise. He is creator and faculty lead for REDCap – a flexible web-based data management software platform, and the REDCap consortium – a network of 2700 academic and non-profit partner sites from 117 countries using the REDCap software platform. He has extensive experience teaching short-courses in data management and translational research within the United States, Japan, China and India.

Read a book that inspired you? Drop a link in the comments, or be bold and write a book review.

More Edgy book reviews to add to your reading list:

Brene Brown Offers Academics A Thoughtful Way to Do A Holiday Reboot

Why You Should Read The Creative Habit

Radical Candor: Can It Work for Academics?

The Power of Pause: How to be More Effective in a Demanding, 24/7 World

A Project Management Approach That Works

Productivity

Problem: A picture is worth a thousand words….

The Goal: Implement a project management strategy that allows you to easily organize and synthesize data, track progress and strategize future efforts.

Enter my strategy…the Storyboard! I admit it…I am a Storyboard junkie! I use them for grant writing, manuscript writing and project management.

So…what exactly is a storyboard? Think of it as a frame by frame depiction of your internal thought process…like storyboards used to outline scenes in a movie. Your storyboard will work for you because it is created by you and for you! You define the layout and the content.

Here is an excerpt from a storyboard for one of my grant applications.

Platform: I prefer Powerpoint for several reasons:

  1. Easy editing.
  2. Familiarity across academic levels.
  3. When you have a presentation to give, just cut and paste!

How it Works – the Evolution of a Storyboard:

  1. Use individual slides to create a virtual representation of a project. Start with the basics:

Why are you doing this project?

What are the questions you want to answer?

What tools do you have at your disposal (or not!) to answer them?

  1. Update the slides to include design of experiments, data, data interpretations as well as action items. The storyboard should be updated regularly, at whatever intervals you find most helpful and manageable. The content will evolve as the project evolves – text will be streamlined, data shifts from preliminary to publication-quality figures, etc. Here is an example containing storyboard slides of the same data in an early version and then later versions of the project storyboard.
  2. Identify benchmarks. A storyboard updated in real time will tell you when it is time to write a paper or submit a grant application for that cool (but tangential!) finding. When the data in your storyboard tells a nice story, it is time for a paper! When a piece of data doesn’t “fit” in your story, it is a signal that this could be the start of a new line of investigation (see Note).

Note: At this point, I start a new storyboard for the manuscript/grant application and pull rationale, experimental design, data and conclusions from the original project storyboard…again, just copy and paste!

How you can apply the Storyboard Strategy NOW:

  1. Start small. Create a Storyboard for your own use, i.e. a manuscript or a grant application.
  2. Use the storyboard as your primary workspace for organizing ideas and data. Don’t draft the paper or grant until you are happy with the flow and bulleted arguments/explanations in your storyboard.
  3. Take inventory along the way…define what works for you! 

a) Identify Needs.

     Is there information you need for your storyboard that is not readily available to you,     i.e., most recent data from your graduate student or experimental design for that piece of data in your inbox? Consider implementing storyboards with your lab members that include these types of details.

b) Evaluate Outcomes.

     Did using a storyboard:

          – decrease the time to final draft?

          – improve quality of writing?

          – ease the writing process?

If the answer to any of the above questions is no, ask why. Use this answer to modify your approach to storyboarding or formulate a new method!

Remember, there are no rules. The only successful strategy for project management is the one that works for you!

Recipe for Hosting a Manuscript Sprint

Productivity / Writing & Publishing

A manuscript sprint harnesses the power of peer accountability and review to get a manuscript from zero to out the door in 6-8 weeks. We all have competing demands that keep manuscripts on the back burner.  This method forces you to make progress on your paper every week.

Ingredients

You will need…

  • 3-5 people, each with a manuscript they need to finish
  • A place to meet (conference rooms, coffee shops and classrooms all work well, as does a big office)
  • A standing time of 60-90 minutes each week for 6-8 weeks
  • Some way to exchanges drafts and comments, such as email or Dropbox
  • A commitment from all members to complete written comments or electronic mark-up each week before the meeting
  • Agreement to limit meeting time to comments and critique

Directions

Collect your writing peers.  You don’t all need to be in the same research area. In fact, it’s good when you aren’t. This better mimics journal review processes where reviewers may study the same disease, say, but have nothing in common with you methodologically.

Agree on a time each week that you will meet. Keep this time sacred.

A week prior to the first meeting, exchange the introductions to your papers.  (Start with intros so that you each get oriented to the others’ topics.) Use the week to comment on everyone’s introductions. Use Track Changes in MS Word or write a separate critique.

At the meeting, discuss each person’s introduction. Divide your time meticulously equally between all participants and appoint a timekeeper/use a timer. (This ensures those at the end don’t get shortchanged.)

At the beginning of their time, the author whose paper is being discussed can take not more than 1-2 minutes to ask for specific advice or call attention to particular things. After that, the author is silent. Don’t fritter away the limited time you have to hear others’ critiques by explaining and defending.  You won’t get to do that for journal reviewers, so don’t do it here.

Repeat as follows:

Week 1: Introduction

Week 2: Methods (+ responses to comments on the Introduction or revised version of the Introduction as needed)

Week 3: Results (Figures and Tables optional)

Week 4: Figures and Tables

Week 5: Discussion

Week 6: References

Week 7: Review of the manuscript as a whole

The order is fungible, so if you want to do results in the second week, go for it. Each week, authors submit a revised version of the manuscript portion incorporating ideas for the previous week’s review. In Week 3, you might be giving your peers both your results and a revised methods section, for example. The manuscripts with rolling, continuous revisions accrue each week.

Here’s an example schedule using real dates:

Why to Do This and Things to Remember

First, do this because you’ll finally get the paper with null findings out the door. But beyond accountability, your peers can also serve as an early warning system.

Are you changing terminology too often? Are you trying to be creative when you really need to be boring because no one’s ever seen this before and they need to see the same thing every single time to get traction? Or if this part and this other part of our hypothesis are two separate things, and someone in the group is saying, “I don’t see how these relate,” that’s a problem, and you can fix it now rather than as part of co-author review or after a reject-and-submit-somewhere-else. And no amount of peer reviewers who say, “I didn’t see that” are defeated by you crying, “It’s in there!” If you find yourself saying that to your sprinting peers, chances are you need edits.

It’s vital to commit to each other to be in every session. When people miss sessions, the wheels start coming off.  You get fewer eyes on your paper, people start extending deadlines to send the next piece, and it all leads to the dark side the group gradually petering out until no one’s left to review the last sections of your paper, which you probably didn’t write anyway because no one was there to keep you accountable.  I’ve seen too many groups fail to finish because their members couldn’t commit to being in the meetings every week.

So don’t do that. Do find your group, set your schedule, and get writing!

The Power of Pause: How to be More Effective in a Demanding, 24/7 World

Book Reviews / Productivity

Count to ten!  Take a deep breath!  But what next? These time-tested techniques are often not enough when conflict threatens to jeopardize a project, although Nance Guilmartin does use this advice as a first step.

Guilmartin suggests that we get curious, not furious,” leading to a culture of learning, resolution and improvement instead of the negative withdrawal, polarization and paralysis we often experience at work when people become angry.

Asking “what don’t I know that I don’t know?” is Guilmartin’s next step to unity and progress replacing the overt or covert negative behavior that can manifest when people and situations are not fully understood.

It is possible to dip into the book for tips and ideas, although reading from start to finish will be the most useful.  Case studies are outlined in text boxes making them easy to ignore or easy to find depending on your preferences.  The concepts are further explained with the analogy of a vehicle braking and acceleration system.  This book is heavy on narrative and light on graphics.  The concepts are easy to understand and can be put into practice immediately.

You can initiate more effective communication today: pause when negative thoughts and feelings arise, replace furious feelings with curious thoughts, find out what is really going on in this situation and finally take note of Guilmartin’s Twelve Ways to Be Your Best and to Succeed in a Demanding 24/7 World!

The message in this book will be useful to you, whatever your role in working with others.

Regrouping to Gain Resilience & Resolve

Book Reviews / Productivity

Scenario*:

  • Early career faculty member with perfect academic pedigree and several strong first-authored publications.
  • Currently at mid-point of second year on tenure track.
  • Rushed resubmission of career development grant.
  • Did not incorporate advice and or use available resources like internal study section or mentor review to optimize the application.
  • Second submission of NIH career development proposal received an unfundable score.

Elements of the conversation:

  • The reviewers in this study section just weren’t helpful and were totally inconsistent with themselves.
  • No one else would have even tried to pull this off. People just don’t understand the science.
  • [Jane Doe] didn’t pull her weight with the stats; we probably should have used neural net modeling.
  • Being on clinical service was a huge distraction. There’s just not enough time.

Upshot:

  • As hard as I’ve trained, it’s not fair to be killing myself this way. It’s not like I can put more into this.
  • Academics has become a pointless grind chasing impact factors, pleasing reviewers, trying to guess what’s trendy, and contorting my research to try to fit someone else’s ideas of what’s important.
  • I’m not going to play this game anymore.

It’s appropriate to empathize with this situation. And venting is fine. Yet, the literature on locus of control, suggests the next thing to do is to make the bitter inventory of how we might have contributed to the undesired outcome. This means moving our thoughts and ruminations from things “out there” to things we control. Own it, regroup, and press on.

We all have blind spots; and none are larger than those related to how we think about and what we think about ourselves. Enter 13 Things Mentally Strong People Don’t Do. Push past the fact that the title sounds macho and like it may be blaming people. In 13 Things, Amy Morin provides an inventory of patterns we need to give up in order to succeed. I’m using the pirate code to pass them along because you will want the book.

Those who will succeed don’t:

  1. Waste Time Feeling Sorry for Themselves
  2. Give Away Their Power
  3. Shy Away from Change
  4. Focus on Things They Can’t Control
  5. Worry about Pleasing Everyone
  6. Fear Taking Calculated Risks
  7. Dwell on the Past
  8. Make the Same Mistakes Over and Over
  9. Resent Other People’s Success
  10. Give Up after the First Failure
  11. Fear Alone Time
  12. Feel the World Owes Them Anything
  13. Expect Immediate Results

The regroup: 

I can make a recovery but will need to:

  • Accept that I’m more energized by my new work and figure out a way to feature different science in the next application.
  • Make and stick with a timeline, including time for revisions and internal review, for the next round.
  • Sit down with more senior folks to decipher the heart of the reviewers concerns so I don’t go there again.
  • Be more candid with my stats collaborator and learn more about our analysis options.
  • Consider an editor and some scientific illustration help to make the product extremely polished.
  • Get proactive about swapping in-patient service demands around grant deadlines with friends who aren’t researchers.

You may be tempted to gift this book to a whiny office mate, a challenging mentee, or a teenager you live with. Don’t! First read it and have the conversation with yourself about what self-talk, emotional hot buttons, and coping behaviors you lean on that may unintentionally undermine your success. (Also consider how you may be modeling external locus of control for those around you.) Most of us have room to work on our ability to analyze strengths and weaknesses, seek and use pointed critique, and reject excuses. When we do, new resilience and resolve will follow.

* Mash up of experiences. Does not represent a specific individual or a common event at our institution.

References:

Locus of control in relation to objective and subjective career success.

Psychological empowerment as a criterion for adjustment to a new job