Negotiating for Your First Academic Position

Job Search / Negotiation

You’ve just articulated your research vision and completed a series of interviews with potential employers. You’re in your office revising a manuscript and you get a text… It’s your first job offer! How do you proceed in a way that gives you the greatest likelihood of success? You’ll have to face a situation that many in academics feel ill prepared to tackle – negotiating.

What do you need to be successful in this first position? You need enough to cover your needs until you generate other revenue streams. Enough of what? Some important things to consider include sufficient time to pursue your work, space, support staff, substrate (supplies/data/resources), and access to trainees/mentees. To understand your needs, talk with your mentor and peers. Create a prioritized list of the things you will need to give you the greatest chance for success.

Everything’s negotiable. Remember that (almost) everything is negotiable, including time allotment, resource pool, use of funds, and access to space. You won’t know if you don’t ask. A good rule of thumb is that you’ll be able to negotiate four major points, so prioritize carefully. Know that you can’t (and shouldn’t) get everything you ask for, so be prepared with the alternative you would be willing to accept.

Take it a step at a time. It’s best to divide the negotiation into stages. Reach resolution for the most important thing, summarize what you’ve agreed to about that element, and then move to the second, and so on. At the end of the negotiation, always request documentation in writing, signed by you and the organization hiring you.

Don’t stress out. The leaders who are hiring you want you to be successful. Negotiations shouldn’t be adversarial; treat them with respect. Keep in mind that you are advocating for your career and the things that you are most passionate about. Successful negotiations should feel like a win-win for all parties, and will position you to launch your career in the most positive light.

More Resources

Like It Or Not, You’re a Negotiator: Getting To Yes

Asking for What You Need: Intentional Negotiation

Not that Kind of Interview: Tales from the Second Visit

Negotiating As Therapy

Yes, You Should Negotiate

The Professor Is In: Why You Should Negotiate Every Job Offer

Salvaging an Insufficient Offer

Job Search / Negotiation

Receiving a faculty offer that is financially untenable is the worst of both worlds: temporary excitement followed by a crash. It triggers disappointment at being led along the hiring path alongside explicit evidence that your value and needs were not understood.

Don’t assume the crash is fatal. The shortest but worst path is to organize every shred of anger into a prompt and terse rejection. This department includes your future professional network. You must be gracious even if the offer is moribund.

The longer path requires cautious steps towards understanding if it is possible to redeem the situation. Preparing to discuss why you can’t accept the initial offer requires knowledge of four key parameters, which you ideally organized before and during your job search, but which can be rapidly acquired.

  1. Concrete information about comparable starting salaries.

Chronicle of Higher Education and AAMC Databook benchmarks (latter is expensive; visit your medical school library) are options as well as journal publications. If the ranges and quantiles are presented for all in a group, e.g. assistant professors, remember to draw the line back from a midpoint of 3.5 to 4.5 years to an approximate starting salary.

  1. Typical start-up packages for your discipline as well as actual projections of the costs of launching your research.

In estimates for your needs distinguish among equipment, personnel, and research costs as these may be handled differently across institutions.

  1. Connections with peers at the institution as a point of reference for norms.

Include early career individuals you met while interviewing or alumni of your prior training institutions. Be discreet.

  1. Familiarity with concepts of negotiating towards mutually desired outcome.

Read Getting to Yes in a single day like your paycheck depends on it – it might.

The Don’ts:

  • Don’t throw in the towel because the gap between expectations and offer is large.
  • Don’t assume the hiring unit is maliciously trying to “low-ball” your offer.
  • Don’t create an artificial emergency. There is time.
  • Don’t complain to others at the institution. Ask questions of trusted individuals, but no ranting allowed.
  • Don’t send an email with specific dollar values. Better yet, don’t email at all.

The Dos:

Have a reality check with trusted mentors. Review what your expectations for salary and start-up range were and any other terms of the offer. It is helpful to share the letter in advance of a discussion (pdf is fine). Again, don’t email your concerns or frustrations, just the facts of the offer, since this assures your unfiltered impressions cannot be accidentally or purposefully shared with others.

Pick up the phone and call the assistant of the individual who is recruiting you (referred to as chair but can be center director, division chief, etc.). Often this is the assistant who coordinated your visit(s). Tell them you enjoyed meeting everyone, you are excited to have received an offer, and you’d like to schedule time to speak with the chair. If necessary note you may need to ask for an extension of the timeline for responding to the offer. Don’t be specific and don’t share any confidences. If pressed, explain “some details might be easiest to talk about.” Meet in person if you are within driving/train distance.

Roleplay the meeting. This does NOT mean think all the possible answers in your head by yourself. This means actually say the words out loud in response to anticipated portions of the meeting. Prepared talking points in broad strokes while resisting the temptation to use a script which can come across as wooden and stiff. Brainstorm multiple scenarios and plan your open and accepting body language in advance (even if you will be on the phone – your brain feels your body language). Aim to address the two or three deal-breakers, not to take a legalese approach to interpretation of the whole offer.

SAMPLE SCRIPTS

Chair’s greeting [typically brief; you may need to steer]:

“We’re excited about having you join us.” or

“I hope you’re pleased with the offer.” or

“What ground should we cover today?”

Start with Salary

Your planned content:

[Affirm] “I’m excited by the idea of coming to Fabulous University. You have a great department and I can see how this would be an ideal fit. [Name specific mentors or colleagues as appropriate.]”

Don’t telegraph a “but” is coming in your tone or posture. Convey genuine interest in what actually attracts you. Try not to say “but” for the entire negotiation. Avoiding “but” and saying “and” is harder than you think. Practice.

[Be direct] I wanted to talk about salary and start-up funds.

Say the actual words when you rehearse with a peer, partner, mentor or coach, then practice again in front of the mirror. Aim for professional but informal, for instance “talk” is less threatening than “discuss.”

[Insert a real pause here. It will feel like a long night on a bed of nails. You are inviting the chair into the moment by leaving a silence. Rehearse this too. Time a practice pause to see how long 10 seconds is – seems like forever. Depending on personality type, the chair may need no time or 30 seconds or more to move into the space.]

Chair:

[Formal]: “What are your salary expectations?” or

[Informal]: “Say more about that.”

Your planned response:

“At state universities in the Northeast, early career faculty in [your discipline] are making between $90,000 and $102,000, so they are likely starting at about $86,000 and $98,000. That squares with the experience of my lab mates and friends who have been on the job market lately.” [Insert another pause here.]

Avoid giving a specific salary. An exact amount creates an anchoring effect, meaning it will overly influence the discussion. You are looking for an initial response to a range.

Potential forks in the road appear here:

Chair:

a. Nope: “I’m sorry to hear that. Our faculty affairs office advises on starting salaries and I am comfortable with $82,000 because it preserves equity among the current faculty.” Brace yourself and be prepared to move on to next points. Don’t communicate even non-verbally that the game is over. The purpose is to find a third way to get results you both want.

     You: I certainly wouldn’t want to be a cause of strife. Let me know if there is wiggle room. Maybe we can talk about what it would look like to get my research launched?

b.  Query: “What does the offer need to be for you to accept?” Your best first attempt is to reflect this back.

     You: What range works for the department?

This communicates you want to be a solid citizen. Don’t personalize the question so they feel they are on the spot, thus “department” and not “you.” Then proceed as in D below.

c. Inscrutable: “I hear you. Let me get more information and get back to you.”

Say thank you for their willingness to consider and drop the topic quickly to move to “Can we talk about getting my research started here?

d. Sure: “Would $86,000 work for you?” Ideally don’t name a lower end of the range early in the discussion than you are unwilling to accept. It is better to be very narrowly specific in the set up than appear to be piling on more information later. So better to say up front, “for state medical centers in the northeast, the 25th percentile for salary for PhD scientists who have completed a post-doctoral fellowship is XX and the 75th percentile is YY, I feel like I could end my job hunt with an offer close to the median.” Avoid refining your source estimates or range later in the discussion, it feels like bait and switch. But this is where you can name your number.

     You: “What about $88,000?” You must know going into this discussion what your number is. You can ask above that but you need to know what you will say “yes” to in advance. If the chair counters “$86,000 is what I can do,” you can ask for time to think but ideally you will answer on the spot. S/he needs to redraft a letter and circulate it through official channels again. So they need a number. Many universities consider the first offer to be The Offer, so needing a re-do comes at some perceived cost to the chair because it means s/he did not get it right the first time.

Getting Start-up Right Depends on Knowing Your Needs

Since the conversation is already moving, it is tempting to be specific about start-up requests too quickly. Be sure you can narrate the story of why you need what you need. Don’t assume the chair understands the cost of your science.

Chair: “What’s off-base about the start-up offer?” or

“So, tell me your thoughts about start-up.”

Your planned response: “I’m aiming to submit a K01 in October of this year. Most of that data will be complete when I get here. Then my goal is to start immediately to put down the best possible foundation for an R01 [or equivalent in your discipline]. Typical preliminary work will involve [what specific number of participants, animals, specimens, lab experiments], and for my work that translates to about $55,000 a year over the first three years [or other timeline from offer].

Implement the same strategy used above for salary. Use ranges if you can honestly report on what similar and comparably accomplished colleagues have received. Note caveats and you’ll get bonus points for candor – “but they are at a private institution” or “they already have their K”. Be able to break down costs. For instance, at times expensive equipment for your individual use is purchased from a capital equipment funds and not included in start-up. The point is to get what you need to do good work, attend meetings, and be productive, not how the dollars are packaged.

What Next?

If discussion is warm and collegial and you have confidence the offer will move closer to your needs, you may be able to squeeze in my favorite question that helps with your understanding of your leadership:

“If we are assessing in five or ten years, whether I have done what you hoped for, what accomplishments will be the most exciting to you and best for the department?”

Don’t let the meeting drag. At a natural breaking point (often this is after only 15 to 30 minutes), say how much you appreciate the offer and their making time to discuss details with you. If you are certain the fit is not right, still find a gracious way to say thank you. If they have offered to prepare a new offer, indicate you will be ready to respond quickly.

*  This approach was recently responsible for a post-doc receiving a revised tenure track offer that increased salary by $4,000 per year and start-up by $35,000 per year. Give it a try. What have you got to lose?

More Resources

Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended on It

Asking for What You Need: Intentional Negotiation

Negotiating for Your First Academic Position

The Professor Is In: Negotiating as Therapy

Yes, You Should Negotiate

The Professor Is In: Why You Should Negotiate Every Job Offer

Asking for What You Need: Intentional Negotiation

Job Search / Negotiation

Regardless of where you are in your career, it can be difficult to ask for what you need. For some this reflects a sense that you can’t or shouldn’t ask for more than what you have; for others, they don’t know who to ask or how to ask; and for some, they have had negative experiences.

Negotiating for what you need is a skill, just like writing a high-quality grant.  So here’s a starter kit:

  1. Get clear on what you need (not what you want). Identify how what you need will advance your ability to be productive and contribute to the overarching mission of your department and the institution. Sometimes it’s useful to create a table identifying how more space, time, or money would translate into specific outcomes and how this directly relates to the department’s goals. This is the bedrock of principled negotiation.
Request Purpose Short-term Outcome Long-Term Outcome
Pilot funds of $100,000 To conduct a proof of principle experiment to serve as preliminary studies section for grants. Submit K-award within 1-2 years. Obtain first R- award/or R equivalent prior to K-award completion.
  1. Be objective. Negotiation is often fueled by emotion. Often we might feel undervalued. Get your facts straight first. If you’re examining your salary, find objective benchmarks to compare your salary and years in rank to others in similar positions (and geographic regions of the country). If no benchmark data exists or is accessible, then reach out to others who have a similar position and learn what is typical. Be sensitive when having these conversations and find trusted colleagues, at your institution or others, who are willing to have a private discussion.
  2. Use appreciative inquiry when you hit a wall. Sometimes the answer will be “no.” Don’t assume you know the reason why. Stay neutral and open to appreciative inquiry. For example, instead of “Don’t you know how hard I’m working? I should be paid more,” try, “It sounds like salary isn’t negotiable. Can you help me understand how salaries are determined and what I would need to achieve to be considered for a raise?”
  3. Know when to pivot. OK, so maybe salary is non-negotiable for the moment. If that’s the case, what IS negotiable? Align yourself, if possible, with your supervisor and ask, “What would you recommend for me?” Or if you know you need some pilot funds to support that truly excellent grant you are preparing to write you might pivot by saying, “Sounds like salary is non-negotiable at this time. For me to enhance my research success, pilot funds could really assist in generating a strong preliminary studies section. How should we proceed? What do you recommend?”

MORE RESOURCES:

Like It Or Not, You’re a Negotiator: Getting to Yes

Salvaging an Insufficient Offer

What’s a BATNA?

You Can’t Always Get What You Want, But It’s Worth a Try

Job Search / Negotiation

Today’s post is from a K-level scholar who knows a lot about negotiation.

Ready to get your first job? Getting too much advice about negotiation? Not sure how to best advocate for yourself while still being reasonable? Here are a few tips:

Decide what you want. Do you want to be a physician scientist with 75% protected time or less? Do you want to run a research team and teach graduate students? You can’t negotiate successfully if you don’t know what you’re trying to achieve.

Determine what you need to be successful. Do you need a research assistant or study coordinator? Do you need new equipment? How many animals do you need for your studies? What space do you need? Where will you store samples? Start with the big picture and then be more specific on different categories (personnel, equipment, salary, time, animals, sample testing). Make a detailed list and figure out how much things will actually cost. This entails asking for quotes and talking to human resources. A clear and detailed plan helps you look and be well-informed and prepared.

Think about the other side. You know what you want and what you need to make this happen. Now, think about what your division chief wants and needs. Try to frame your discussion on how asking for X will help you achieve goal Y and emphasize how that investment is wise for the division. You need to realize your true value, but recognize that you are potentially replaceable. It is helpful to explore options outside your institution, but you need to be prepared to go if you try to play two offers against each other.

Remember it’s not personal, it’s business. Stay focused on your needs and how X gets you to Y. There are tradeoffs to everything. Be reasonable and professional. It’s ok to say you need time to think about the specifics.

Take notes. After each meeting or discussion, send an email summarizing what you heard (which may not be what they think they said) and what each person needs to work on before the next discussion. Having a timely paper trail is really helpful to keep things on track.

It’s scary and daunting at first, but remember you are not alone. We all have to do this along the way and we all make it through. Good luck!

More Resources

Salvaging an Insufficient Offer

Asking for What You Need: Intentional Negotiation

Negotiating for Your First Academic Position

Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended on It

Book Reviews / Job Search / Negotiation

Getting to Yes may still be the bible of negotiation books, but Chris Voss’s Never Split the Difference offers an intriguing alternative perspective. Instead of preaching objectivity and separating the people from the situation, Voss, a former FBI crisis negotiator, teaches how to wade into the messy emotions of a negotiation and make tactical use of them to get what you want.

Voss introduces each chapter with a case study from his FBI career before dissecting the situation and tools he used to handle it, which makes this book more of a page-turner than you might expect from a business book. Key to Voss’s approach is empathy for the other party in the negotiation. This doesn’t (necessarily) mean being nice to them, but rather understanding why the other person’s actions make sense to them. Once you have developed empathy with the other party, several tools become available to you.

Voss posits that behind each objective argument lies an emotional driver, and speaking to that driver results in a better outcome for you. Through labeling emotions and “accusation audits,” strong emotions can be identified and defused. (Tricks such as the “Late Night FM DJ Voice” help here too.) Examples of this in the book include overcoming a potential donor’s reluctance by labeling her fears (the charity won’t use the donation in the way she wants); representatives from one company acknowledging their actions look bad to a partner company, thus breaking through animosity to work on solutions; and Voss himself acknowledging two fugitives’ fear of the FBI team outside their door until they gave themselves up, convinced they would not be shot on sight.

Along with labeling emotions, one of the most valuable strategies Voss recommends is using questions that begin with “what” or “how” to elicit more information and work towards agreement. For example, instead of “does this work for you,” ask, “What about this works/doesn’t work for you?” With these kinds of questions, you implicitly ask for help, which triggers goodwill, and gently engineers the situation so that the other party uses mental energy and resources to overcome your challenges, thus guiding him or her into helping you design a solution.

These questions also engage the other party and allow them to feel in control. Voss uses the example of kidnappers asking for a large sum of ransom money; he (calmly!) replies, “How am I supposed to do that?” thus engaging the kidnappers in building resolution. This tool might be useful if a chair asks you to take on so much clinic time that it interferes with your K’s 75% protected time. Try asking, “How am I supposed to balance X days of clinic with the time the NIH requires I spend on research?”

Dozens of strategies like this wait inside the pages of this book, well-explained and exemplified with situations where they have worked in the business, personal, and law enforcement realms. How can you afford to pass it up?

More Resources

Asking for What You Need: Intentional Negotiation

Like It or Not, You’re a Negotiator: Getting to Yes

You Can’t Always Get What You Want, But It’s Worth a Try

Like It or Not, You’re a Negotiator: Getting to Yes

Book Reviews / Negotiation

 

“Like it or not, you are a negotiator,” state Harvard Negotiation Project faculty Roger Fisher, William Ury, and Bruce Patton in the introduction to this clear and concise guide to negotiating on principle rather than position.  This book will help you navigate all the negotiations in your life, from hiring lab staff to deciding where to go to dinner with your spouse.  Originally published thirty years ago but still full of sound advice, this revised edition is newly updated with contemporary examples of each component comprising the method of principled negotiation.

The authors begin by identifying the problems with traditional, or positional, bargaining: namely, that by digging into their positions, each side misses opportunities to work toward mutual gain and to retain good relationships with the opposition.  In clearly-delineated and focused chapters, the authors go on to detail each step of their negotiation method.  They teach you the best ways to invent options for joint gain—frequently, the parties in a negotiation do not want mutually exclusive things, and in fact can both stand to gain much of what they want, as with the parable the authors use about two children squabbling over an orange and finally dividing down the middle only to learn that one child wanted the fruit and the other the peel.  They teach you how to insist on using objective criteria, and the best ways to separate the people from the problem and see things from the other side’s point of view.  The dialogues they use to illustrate each of these concepts, ranging from union members speaking with management to a tenant negotiating with his landlord, are especially helpful as starting points for your own negotiations.

If something goes wrong, the authors have your back.  In a section on the major problems that can crop up in negotiations, they tell you how to make the most of their method even if the other side has more leverage than you do, or how to use “negotiation jujitsu” when the person on the other side won’t go along with, for example, using objective criteria like average salary for a position across multiple organizations when discussing a possible raise.

Step-by-step structure makes nebulous ideas we have about negotiation strategy concrete. For that, this book is invaluable.

Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Revised Edition)
Roger Fisher, William Ury, and Bruce Patton
New York: Penguin, 2011

More Resources